• >>>NEW Colour 2.0 Workshop<<<
  • Technique
    • Latest Techniques
    • FREE TIPS
    • Quick Tips
    • Video
    • Site Search
    • Blog
    • Archives
  • Mentoring
  • 2026 Workshops
  • >Online Workshops<
  • Studio Lighting Books
  • Contact
    • Newsletter
    • Contact
    • Statement
Jake Hicks Photography
  • >>>NEW Colour 2.0 Workshop<<<
  • Technique
    • Latest Techniques
    • FREE TIPS
    • Quick Tips
    • Video
    • Site Search
    • Blog
    • Archives
  • Mentoring
  • 2026 Workshops
  • >Online Workshops<
  • Studio Lighting Books
  • Contact
    • Newsletter
    • Contact
    • Statement

"T.E.A.M, Together Everyone Achieves More"- Mathew Jordan Smith

Wayne Kahn discussing poses with the modelTheir are many fields of photography that will require more than just you the photographer to achieve a certain shot, even if its just one assistant to bounce some light around with a reflector. With fashion some photos may even require 10 or more people to be involved, hair stylists, clothes stylists, prop makers, make-up, art directors, models, clients, all of these may also have assistants as well and thus the list goes on. Some of the most seemingly simple shots will often have scores of people peering over the photographers shoulder all giving their input. So who is in charge of all these creative minds all eager to make their mark, unfortunately their is no one hard and fast answer. It varies from job to job, as a guide though if there is an art director present they will be the one who usually has the final word, but even they can be swayed, they are creatives at the of the day and even they are susceptible to a certain amount of creative inspiration from the photographer. Sometimes though the client will be there overseeing how their money is being used, occasionally they will sit back and take solace in the fact that they have chosen the right art director, photographer etc for the job, safe in the knowledge that the people around them know their specialties and jobs better than anyone. The reality all to often unfortunately is that they rarely have the ability to visualise the final product or image through the preceding working process, and regularly fall foul to taking control. One point to remember here is that they are generally a person who is used to being in charge of their own professional field or company, that is why it comes naturally for them to try and take control if you let them.

Jo Basten hair stylist with modelHair stylist Zoe Adams with modelIn my experience with fashion, hair and editorial shots the process is usually very organic, by that I mean their are many variables involved that cannot be controlled nor should they, you are trying to create something new after all. As photographers we should be able to adapt to any given situation and overcome them, occasionally this may create something great you couldn't of anticipated prior to shooting. This rule applies to all members of the team as well, perhaps the models hair doesn't have the right volume for a particular cut, maybe the clothes aren't quite fitting the model, perhaps the models complexion is playing havoc for the make-up artist, even the weather on your location shoot could be throwing your exposure readings off. This list can go on and all these potential problems threaten to disrupt or even ruin the shot, it is only through having an amazing team of people who know their specific jobs inside out that this can be avoided.

So how do you get this amazing team of creatives? Some photographers will only work with a specific team that they know and trust. This has its advantages of course, you know what you will get and you can rely on them to provide it without the hassle of having to chase them or worry about personalities clashing. Sometimes you wont get a choice, the art director may already have a well oiled team of people in place and photographers get brought in and out as styles change. This can be tricky for a photographer to manage as you are the new guy trying to create something new and creative with a close and comfortable team without treading on too many toes. The other option, and perhaps the one that I feel most beneficial for all involved is to take it on a job by job basis. Just as you would never ask an architectural photographer to do a fashion shoot, you would never ask a wedding make-up artist to do make-up for a fashion shoot or a hair stylist who specialises in hair-up styling to do session styling. All of these people know their field in broad terms,  I could take an 'alright' picture of some architecture because I have a broad understanding of my subject but a dedicated architectural photographer will take a comparatively 'outstanding' picture. The same applies across all disciplines and should be considered on a case by case basis.

If you are fortunate enough to be able to choose your team prior to shooting their are a few key points that I would recommend bearing in mind, and if you don't get to choose them at the very least you should take the opportunity to meet with them before hand. Ideally though you will be an integral part of the creative process from the very beginning. Normally I pitch a concept or specific lighting style to a client and already know that a specific models bone structure will work better with the light than others for that particular shot. For example will I be using hard or soft lighting and by being involved from the start I can be at the model castings and be able to visualise how the final shot will look and who is best suited to sell that look. On shoot day I normally work closely with another photographer called Wayne Kahn, he has a different perspective to myself and he will often see things that perhaps in the energy of shooting you would normally overlook, this can sometimes be the key to capturing those rare shots that you hadn't previously perceived. Depending on what your shooting you may need a clothing stylist, some photographers like a stylist to just turn up with the clothes and then just go and sit quietly and not interfere with the shoot, personally I like them to get involved. Polly Errington is a great fashion stylist I have had the pleasure of working with on many shoots, she is never afraid to jump in to tweak and pull the clothes, sometimes because its just not clear how certain outfits are supposed to be worn. Make-up, as I mentioned earlier is another key component, make-up that is applied at weddings for other people to see is very different to make-up that is applied for the camera to see, getting this wrong can mean the difference in you spending days retouching images or hours. Hair as well is a personal skill, a hair stylist who has any experience will have a book of photos they can show or email you, getting a look at these before hand will give you a clear idea of what they can do. Asking them how long some of styles took to achieve is a good question to ask, knowing that a particular look will take them three hours to achieve will definitely make or break the shoot.

British Hairdressing Awards shoot at Wella UKWhen Shooting starts, all of these people will want to have an input, not just because its a chance to make their mark but because their name will be attached to the final photographs. At some point though you will have to say now is the time for you to start taking pictures. With a lot of people behind you shouting in your ear, it can occasionally be difficult to please everybody all of the time and sometimes this should just be seen as part of the process of creating something with other passionate people. A word of warning however, the one person in my opinion as photographers we should never annoy is the model. They are the only person actually in the shot and essentially are actors and actresses, if they are upset or angry for any reason this will show in the final images and can have an overwhelming impact on how the shoot turns out. No matter how amazing the lighting, styling, hair or make-up is, the viewer of any photograph will always be overridden by the human element of the image.

With all these elements in play producing a series of unique photographs at the end can be an incredibly rewarding experience for the whole team, but one final word of caution, if for any reason the photographs turn out badly their is only ever one person that gets blamed, the photographer.

Friday 08.05.11
Posted by Jake Hicks
 

WATER & LIGHT

Canon EOS 1Ds Mark II - CAMERA

85 mm - LENS

F 5.6 - F-STOP

1/125 sec - SHUTTER SPEED

100 - FILM SPEED

Flash - LIGHT SOURCE

 

Caution is always the staple of any shoot that mixes 4000w of electricity with water, consequently I made sure that all four of the flash heads were wrapped in plastic to avoid impromptu flying trips across the studio. It is also worth noting that the make and model of the flash used will have an effect on how the falling water droplets appear in the finished image. I was using the older model Bowens Esprit 500w monobloc heads, these are great multi purpose studio and location lights but they are certainly not renowned for their short flash duration. Monobloc flash heads like these will light up quickly but will still glow as the flash fades. This may not seem to the human eye as slow, but when flash durations range from 1/700th of a second to 1/7000th it can have a dramatic effect on how sharp your final image will look. When shooting relatively stationary objects or portraiture it goes unnoticed, but when you are trying to capture fast moving objects like water droplets it can create an issue. The flash can capture the droplets with its initial burst but as the light fades it is still capturing the image as the droplet falls further, resulting in the droplet to appear as if it is travelling up not down. The type of photography you do should have a distinct effect on the flash unit you choose, if your planning on shooting a lot of fast moving objects or people like dancers then choosing a flash unit with a short flash duration is paramount.

Tuesday 07.19.11
Posted by Jake Hicks
Comments: 3
 

"As photographers we create 2D representations of 3D objects" - Dave Montizambert

Objective and Subjective Lighting

Previously I have mentioned how we all make a conscious decision on how we want our finished image to look like before we release the shutter. No matter how vague that initial idea, there will still be a deliberate choice to allow light to be exposed to the frame therefore representing our subject in a chosen way. In its most basic form this idea will be that there is enough light hitting (reflecting off) the object to make it visible in the image all the way up to deciding if and how we want to modify the size, angle, intensity and shape of our light source to intentionally capitalise on the semiotic relationship the viewer has with the subject. Included here are two images of the same subject but lit in two very different ways to evoke varying responses. The image on the left is shot with a directional soft light that envelops the skin and emulates the light from a window. The image on the right however is shot using a very hard-light from a ring flash that accentuates any tone with a sharp drop-off in light to dark and is used to give a more fashion feel to the shot. I have not even mentioned the choice of pose, styling, colours or post production options, all of which should be decided upon consciously or otherwise, to achieve a shot. In short, apart from actually lighting a subject accurately to portray its shape and features, and by accurately I mean correctly exposed, the rest is down to personal style. To photograph a fresh green apple correctly it would be lit to portray it as green, this is objective, portraying it as anything else is seen as the image looking wrong. You choosing to hard-light the apple to accentuate its shine with spectrals or deciding to add more light to fill in the shadows and minimise shine by using a softer light to portray it as a more natural and organic apple is subjective, this is up to you.

Areas of Illumination

If you were to point a single light source at an object that is of one tone you would see at least three different densities occur. The areas of light on a subject can be classified as shadow, diffused and specular. You would also witness the areas of change between these regions, they are known as edge transfers.

Diffused Area

This is the correctly exposed area, representing the true tonality of the subject, or the natural brightness of the subject. This is objective, to truly represent the subject in question we have to document it accurately. A purple ball photographed in any other way than to depict it as purple would be classed as the image looking wrong.

Shadow Area

This is under exposed in relation to the correctly exposed diffuse area. This is subjective, there can be no light or it can have a fill light to lessen the shadow. You can’t say this shadow is wrong, you can only say I like it or don’t like it. Altering the shadow edge transfer and the rate of transfer from the shadow tone into the diffused value tone can control how much shadow there is.

Specular Area

This is over exposed in relation to the correctly exposed diffuse area. Traditionally called, shine, hot-spot or sheen. It is the mirror image of the light source seen on the surface of the subject, most commonly seen as catch-lights in people’s eyes. Speculars as well as shadows, have edge transfers, only these govern how shiny a surface appears. Speculars are subjective and the size of them can be adjusted to personal preference, not rightly or wrongly.

Tuesday 07.12.11
Posted by Jake Hicks
Comments: 1
 

DARK FIELD ILLUMINATION

Canon EOS 1Ds Mark II - CAMERA

70 mm - LENS

F 13 -F-STOP

1/250 sec -SHUTTER SPEED

100 -FILM SPEED

Flash - LIGHT SOURCE

This type of lighting technique is more commonly seen in still life lighting, the even light that wraps around an object is perfect for giving darker shiny objects that extra ‘pop’ when shot against a dark background. This can be seen clearly here on the image of the model with the guitar and on the still life shot of the metal bodied camera. 

This lighting technique is actually very easy to achieve even with just one light. The trick is to use a large light source (larger than your subject at least), here I used a large soft-box but a large window could have the same effect, and block out the middle area of light. This blocked out area will effectively be your background for the shot. For mine I hung a large piece of black velvet in front of my soft-box but a large black card would also do the same. I like to use black velvet because of its deep texture it reflects very little light and should be part of every photographers kit. It will come in handy on many occasions on set and I use it as a backdrops or for flagging light.

What you are trying to achieve by blocking out most of the light is a narrow strip of light all the way around your subject, varying the size of this strip will vary the results so its worth experimenting with it. What this does is to light just the edges of the subject which really makes them stand out from the darker background.

Considering that this image is pretty much shot with just one light, you can quickly and easily get some great results. The secondary light you see being used here is really just adding some shine to the guitar and therefore turned down very low and thanks to the barn-doors not affecting the model. Shooting this shot with one light effectively though means that you will need to bounce some of that light back into the shot. Here I used a white bounce board but a simple white sheet would have the same effect. By moving that white bounce board closer to the model I was able to brighten the model and conversely by moving it further away I was able to darken the model. Again playing with this will offer different looks so its a good idea to try a couple of different distances.

Both of the photographs of the model and the camera were shot using the same lighting technique even though they are made of very different materials and very different sizes. The shot of the model shows clear edge lighting on both the shiny guitar and on the models skin and a good tip when trying to get strong edge lighting on naturally non-shiny objects like skin is to apply a small amount of oil or other liquid. This will allow the skin to catch the light and give you some strong spectral highlights (a direct reflection of the light that is behind) and it also helps to enhance any colours and contrast in tattoos.

In the picture of the camera the same technique picks up on the naturally shiny metal casing making it clearly stand out from the background. This is one of the reasons it's a very popular still life lighting technique because it means the product is very easy to remove from the background and place it in a composite scene afterwards.

I hope I’ve given you a few new ideas to try next time you want to shoot something different.  Let me know your thoughts on this article by commenting below or reaching out to me on my Facebook page I do my best to respond to all questions and comments.

Sunday 07.03.11
Posted by Jake Hicks
Comments: 3
 

"Aside from the laws of physics, there are no rules to good photography" - Christopher Grey

Constructing an image

As photographers we create two-dimensional representations of three-dimensional objects. This is achieved purely by manipulating light in such a way that it is clear to the viewer exactly what it is we are trying to portray.

Constructing an image should involve the photographer working to a set brief and having a clear goal in mind of what the finished image will look like. Whether it is shooting a portrait, fashion or still life, the photograph should clearly and accurately represent the subject. To do this it is necessary to light the subject correctly so as to portray its features distinctly. The characters face in a portrait or a fashion models clothes will have to be correctly exposed or the highlights on a shiny object in sill life, will have to be accurately placed to clearly show its glossy surface. These things are objective, they are not open to interpretation, and they are there to accurately fulfill the brief in their most fundamental way.

To do this, we must be aware of what we are shooting and have the necessary skills to accomplish the task. This is done through planning and knowing how the equipment works. From subject to background, lights to subject, subject to camera, and every combination in-between, everything in the studio plays a part in affecting the finished image. Failure to acknowledge this fact will result in a trial and error process that will result in a drawn out procedure where the accomplishment of a final image that fits the brief is far from guaranteed.

Although the title quote is true, it can be useful to have few key 'guidelines' in the back of your mind before you release the shutter. The following statements are aimed more towards studio lighting but most of their principles apply to all fields of photography.

  • Try and avoid cross-contamination when using multiple lights, overlapping shadows create confusion for the viewer. The most successful photos have always given the ‘appearance’ of being lit from a single source.
  • Correctly expose one light at a time with a light meter, then turn them all on and meter them again. This will show you if they affecting one another.
  • If you are lighting your background with coloured gels, try under-exposing them by a couple of stops to get strong vibrant colours.
  • Ensure that your key light, the one lighting the models face, is working with your models pose. Try to keep clean crisp shadows and try to avoid dark eye sockets without the telltale sparkle or catch-lights in the subject’s eyes. Talk to the model before you start shooting, explain where your key-light is which way you want them to direct most of their poses.
  • With your secondary lights, ensure that they are giving you the desired effect. Remember, these lights are subjective; you can use them to either fill in shadows or create highlights in the hair. The power and exposure that they give you is down to your discretion, if you want to blow the highlights in the hair to give it extra shine you can.
  • Try to match your poses to your chosen lighting style. If your going for a hard-lit style, try to capitalize on the dramatic shadows with dynamic and strong poses, remember that the absence of light in areas of the image will create shapes, capitalise on this to draw the viewer around the photograph.
  • Keep an eye on background clutter. Check for objects that shouldn’t be in the image. A cable coming out of side of models head can take seconds to move on set but hours remove later in post, especially where hair is involved.
  • Utilize your space. If your finding your key light spilling onto the background, move your lighting setup further away to compensate.
  • Always light meter but above all check the histogram of your images whilst your shooting, it's to late to check them later in post.
Tuesday 06.28.11
Posted by Jake Hicks
Comments: 2
 
Newer / Older